Conservative Party Policy Killed Henry Nowak

Find out how the Conservative’s Police Race Action Plan directly contributed to the death of Henry Nowak by forcing officers to prioritise accusations of racism ahead of providing urgent medical care.

The leader of the Conservative Party, Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch – better known as ‘Kemi’, spent the majority of last week on a whirlwind media tour telling anyone that would listen that it was herself and the Conservatives that were at the forefront of the fight to bring back ‘common sense’ and ‘colour blind’ policing. This is a line that is being trotted out by many Conservatives, with the implication being that Henry Nowak’s death was due to Labour Party policy – this is of course complete nonsense. Every single piece of legislation, national policy initiative or strategic guidance that helped contribute to Henry Nowak’s death, and allowed for the lenient sentencing of his murderer, was passed or implemented by a Conservative government. This is the elephant in the room, and the truth that both Badenoch and the Conservative Party don’t want the public to be aware of.

Badenoch’s media blitz reached its peak when on June 4^th 2026 the Daily Mail ran an article titled: “Henry Nowak’s family want ‘common sense’ policing ‘to bring society together’, says Kemi Badenoch as murdered teen’s parents leave Downing Street following meeting with Keir Starmer”. This article was little more than a puff piece for Badenoch, even going as far as to include the full text of a post she made on X to press the point that it is her and the Conservatives who are at the forefront of the battle against ‘woke’ policy. Part of Badenoch’s post on X reads as follows:

We must also be prepared to examine, carefully and seriously, religious practices or exemptions that permit the carrying of dangerous weapons in public, and other activities that are not conducive to the public good. We also need to examine where the law needs to change.

Henry’s family do not want anger to tear communities apart. They are a family who have friends across faith and race, and so did Henry. His family want his memory to help bring our society together.

Everyone knows I have strong views about how we should deal with equality under the law. What the family agreed with me on is that we need to bring common sense back, and that is what we should all be fighting for.

This is all rather curious, as what Badenoch chose to omit from her post was that all the laws and pieces of police guidance that needed to ‘change’ were in fact implemented by successive Conservative governments – and worse still, she was part of one of the Conservative governments in question. However, by her omission the post reads as if she and her party were the ones needed to solve a problem of bad policy created and implemented by the Labour Party. Badenoch is clearly attempting to paint herself as a crusader against liberal policy, but this is all one giant misdirection.

Bearing in mind what Kemi Badenoch is trying to claim, before we examine all the ways in which the Conservative Party has helped to create the conditions that contributed to the death of Henry Nowak, it is first important to understand how embedded Badenoch was within the previous Conservative government. Whilst Badenoch would undoubtedly like the public to believe that she is a ‘breath of fresh air’; someone relatively new to politics who intends to breathe fresh life into the Conservative Party, and as such is not culpable for its previous failings, this could not be further from the truth. Badenoch is 46-years-old, being born in 1980 in Wimbledon, London, before spending most of her youth in Nigeria and the United States before permanently relocating to Britain at the age of 16. She joined the Conservative Party in 2005, and was first elected to Parliament on June 8^th 2017 as the MP for Saffron Walden (now North West Essex).

Badenoch then appeared to be fast tracked through the ranks of the party and has held a number of ministerial roles within the government – a total of seven in fact. Between 2019 and 2024 she served in the following positions: Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (July 2019 – February 2020), Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (February 2020 – September 2021), Minister of State for Equalities (February 2020 – July 2022), Minister of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (September 2021 – July 2022), Minister for Women and Equalities (October 2022 – July 2024), Secretary of State for International Trade (September 2022 – February 2023) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade (February 2023 – July 2024). An impressive resume for someone who was first elected in 2017, what’s more, concrete proof that Badenoch played an important role at the centre of the Conservative Party during a time when immigration was at an all-time high and numerous policies were implemented that undoubtedly contributed to the death and suffering of Henry Nowak.

I have published two articled on the death of Henry Nowak, one that dealt with the case as a whole and the initial public reaction, and one that examined the legality of the lenient sentence received by his killer, Vickrum Digwa. As such, I have touched on several of these issues before, but if you wish to read those two earlier articles, they can be found here:

Police Handcuff Dying White Boy as he Bleeds Out
https://markacollett.substack.com/p/police-handcuff-dying-white-boy-as

Henry Nowak’s Killer Receives a Lenient Sentence
https://markacollett.substack.com/p/henry-nowaks-killer-receives-a-lenient

The first piece of legislation that helped create the conditions that allowed Vickrum Digwa to legally carry the knife that he used to kill Henry Nowak was the Criminal Justice Act 1988. The Criminal Justice Act 1988 was passed on July 28^th of that year; at the time Magaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, Douglas Hurd was the Home Secretary and Sir Patrick Mayhew was the Attorney General. At the time, Kemi Badenoch was only 8-years-old and didn’t even live in the UK, so it would be grossly unfair to in any way attribute the wrong doings of the Thatcher government to her. However, it is fair to state that at the age of 25 she was happy to join the Conservative Party – either without the knowledge of their previous wrong doings or because she simply didn’t care what successive Conservative governments had done to the country. Whilst she was not involved in the passing of this legislation, by joining the party there is an implied approval of the organisations past record.

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 controls and limits the carrying of knives in public through Section 139 which makes it illegal to carry any sharply pointed or bladed article in a public place. However, Section 139(5)(b) of the Act creates a specific statutory defence if an individual is carrying the bladed article “for religious reasons”. This exception is what allowed Vickrum Digwa to walk the streets of Southampton with not one, but two knives – a larger Shastar dagger that was worn openly in a sheath attached to a belt, and a smaller Kirpan, worn on a cord around his neck and concealed under his clothing. It was the larger Shastar dagger that was used to stab Henry Nowak four times and slash him once across the face. What’s more, it was this legislation that allowed the judge presiding over the trial of Henry’s murder to conclude that Vickrum Digwa “had a good legal reason for having the dagger” on the night he killed Henry. This “good legal reason” was the exemption granted to him by the 1988 Conservative government’s legislation.

Whilst Badenoch can arguably be given a pass for the 1988 legislation, she cannot be granted a similar pass for the Offensive Weapons Act 2019. The legislation came into force on May 16^th 2019 when Theresa May was Prime Minister, Sajid Javid was Home Secretary and Geoffrey Cox was Attorney General. This act updates UK knife laws by introducing stricter definitions and expanding existing bans to private spaces, while explicitly strengthening legal protections for Sikhs. The Act creates a new offence by making it illegal to possess certain weapons – such as knuckledusters, throwing stars, and “zombie knives” – even in private places like a home. However, the 2019 Act heavily clarifies and broadens the exemptions established in the 1988 Act to grant privileges to the Sikh community. Under Section 47, the Act amends the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to ensure that large ceremonial Kirpans (such as traditional curved swords) are explicitly protected. The Act also creates a specific defence allowing individuals to possess these large curved swords in private for religious reasons and introduces a legal defence for giving or presenting a curved sword to another person during a Sikh religious ceremony or cultural event. Finally, the Act provides a defence for the supply and importation of these items, as long as it is done strictly to make the sword available for a Sikh ceremonial event.

Crucially, when the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 was passed into law, Kemi Badenoch was an elected member of parliament for the Conservative Party. As such, we know that Badenoch voted consistently in favour of the Offensive Weapons Bill as it progressed through the House of Commons between 2018 and 2019. Because the exemptions for Sikhs (allowing the possession and presentation of larger ceremonial Kirpans) were explicitly backed by the Conservative government and cross-party consensus, Badenoch voted in line with her party to pass these provisions into law. It appears that in 2019, Kemi wasn’t crusading for ‘equality under the law’ or opposing the exemptions that granted the followers of foreign religions the right under English law to carry deadly weapons – in fact quite the opposite; she was eagerly voting more anti-white legislation through parliament. This easily verifiable truth shows that Badenoch knowingly backed two-tier policy as an elected MP.

But obviously, it is not just the legislation that granted Sikhs the right to carry deadly weapons that led to the death of Henry Nowak. The most shocking and upsetting factor in Henry’s death was the way in which the police treated him as he lay dying from the stab wounds inflicted upon him by Vickrum Digwa. The police attending the scene immediately took the testimony of Henry’s killer as gospel and proceeded to handcuff and arrest Henry whilst mocking his pleas for help. As Henry begged for his life, police body cam footage recorded one of the arresting officers mockingly stating: “You’ve been stabbed? Whereabouts? I don’t think you have mate.” As the police forced Henry’s arms up behind his back, his pale white hand can be seen almost totally drained of blood, as clearly the bleeding from his wounds had caused his extremities to turn white. But both Henry’s pleas and the physical evidence was ignored by officers – and crucially, this is because those officers were following police policy; policy that was written and came into force under the previous Conservative government.

The police policy that led to the horrific treatment of Henry Nowak stems from a document called the Police Race Action Plan which was initially released in draft form in May 2022 before being rolled out to police forces between 2023 and 2024. In 2022 when the draft of the Police Race Action Plan originally surfaced it was Boris Johnson who was Prime Minister, Priti Patel was the Home Secretary and Suella Braverman was the Attorney General. It is this national strategic policy which specifically forced officers at the scene to behave in the way that they did. A little due diligence immediately reveals that the Police Race Action Plan was drafted when Kemi Badenoch was a government minister and rolled out to police forces when she was Minister for Women and Equalities. By 2022 and beyond Badenoch was deeply embedded in the Conservative Party hierarchy – a fact made obvious when she succeeded Rishi Sunak as party leader, being elected to the role on November 2^nd 2024. Badenoch is now doing her best to distance herself from this strategic guidance, but not only was she a minister when this guidance was drafted and rolled out, but she is now the Conservative Party leader. But what she really doesn’t want the public to know is that directly elected Conservative Police and Crime Commissioners are still implementing the Police Race Action Plan to this day.

The Police Race Action Plan is freely available online, and is 57 pages in length. It is a sizeable document, and as such analysing it in full and going into the minutia of the guidance would be a topic worthy of a short book. The best place to start with the document is its core aims, which are to establish the police’s commitment to a “zero tolerance” policy when it comes to the issue of racism and that police forces must be “anti-racist” in all that they do. It is important to note, that this anti-racist policy is not the same as ‘colour blind’ policing, in fact it is the opposite. The official guidance states that ensuring racial equity “does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘colour blind’”. Throughout the document, it is clear that the authors are not looking to bring about equality, but instead equity – which creates a system whereby people are treated differently depending on their racial or ethnic background, essentially creating the basis for the two-tier justice we see today in policing. The evidence of this can be found in the document from the very outset. Two telling quotes from the beginning of the plan can be found in the section titled ‘Overview’ and illustrate exactly what the Police Race Action Plan is attempting to achieve:

PAGE 9:
Policing recognises that the racial disparities affecting Black people are most acute and the trust deficit presents a significant challenge to police legitimacy and effectiveness. This plan, therefore, focuses on improving policing for Black people.

When we say Black people, we mean Black African, Black British, Black Caribbean, Black Other and Mixed Black backgrounds.

Disparities also exist in policing’s relationships with other ethnic minorities, including the UK’s Asian communities and Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities. We do not intend to minimise these issues. The plan is in addition to ongoing efforts to ensure that policing is inclusive and fair to all, and that concerns from minority or under-represented groups are acted on.

PAGE 11
The plan seeks to create an anti-racist culture, values and behaviours within policing. This will inform all operational policing practice, improving the experience and outcomes for Black people. It will enable the experiences of our Black communities, officers and staff to have a direct influence on our policies and practices going forward.

You can read the full document here:
https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/Police-Race-Action-Plan.pdf

These two quotes set the tone for the rest of the document. They clearly establish a need to address the concerns of every racial and ethnic group in Britain – with the notable exception being the concerns of White Britons. What’s more, the authors of the document make it clear that the thought process which aims to create an “anti-racist culture” must be implemented at all levels of “operational policing practice”. This is not a document intended to be read by higher-ups, merely to be paid lip service at specially convened diversity training days, but instead this is a piece of strategic guidance that informs officers at every level of the police hierarchy on how they should approach their day-to-day policing tasks. The document makes it very clear that the guidance affects and should inform front line officers – such as the ones attending the scene of Henry Nowak’s murder.

Throughout the document there are many instances of what appears to be anti-racist or ‘woke’ jargon – words and phrases that we have all heard many times. However, the issue is understanding how such words and phrases are interpreted by front line officers and how every day policing has changed thanks to this guidance. One phrase that everyone will be aware of is “zero tolerance” – but how does this actually affect the way in which officers behave? Thanks to “zero tolerance”, under the Police Race Action Plan guidelines, allegations of racism are classified as critical incidents that require immediate, aggressive intervention. The training and culture surrounding the plan heavily emphasise that officers must not doubt individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds when they report some form of racial hostility. The application of this is both frightening and obvious: when a person from an ethnic minority background reports a ‘racial’ crime, officers are trained to take the word of the person reporting the crime rather than challenging that person and demanding evidence. This immediately places an incredible and overriding weight on a claim of racism and as such places indigenous Britons at a significant disadvantage to ethnic minorities when dealing with the police.

This “zero tolerance” policy had a chilling and deadly effect on the night of Henry Nowak’s murder. When Vickrum Digwa falsely claimed that he was the victim of a racist attack, officers were culturally and operationally conditioned to treat that specific verbal claim as an overriding priority, effectively bypassing standard scepticism or objective fact-checking at the scene. This can be seen in the police body cam footage: despite Henry Nowak being the person on the floor pleading that he had been stabbed, all the officers at the scene took the side of his killer, believing his lies and acting on his directions. Officers went as far as to restrain and handcuff Henry even though his hands were visibly ice-white. Henry Nowak then slipped into an unconscious state whilst wearing police handcuffs, his last experience in life being his arrest. This must have not only added an even greater degree of stress to his final moments, but it was also a clearly and deeply degrading act – one which the officers were more than happy to play their part in.

Whilst it is likely that Kemi Badenoch would like people to believe that these horrendous actions were indicative of a small but unrepresentative group of ‘woke’ officers – that is absolutely not the case. Police officers have not only been told to act in this manner, but have also been incentivised to behave this way. Police forces and individual officers face intense institutional scrutiny regarding how they handle interactions with members of minority communities. Officers are routinely audited on their compliance with diversity, equity, and inclusion guidelines which were put into place as a result of the Police Race Action Plan. Officers who fail to immediately and robustly act on an allegation of racism – even an unverified one – face a high risk of internal disciplinary action. An officer who does not comply with this guidance runs the risk of being labelled institutionally racist, or even faces the prospect of being at the centre of a public scandal. The Police Race Action Plan has created an operational environment where officers prioritise ticking compliance boxes over assessing physical reality. In effect, the crime scene itself and the physical evidence that is immediately on hand and clearly visible becomes less important to arresting officers than the testimony of someone from an ethnic minority background.

When officers arrived at the scene of Henry’s murder, Vickrum Digwa immediately introduced the issue of race, claiming he had been the victim of a racial attack. However, it wasn’t just Digwa who will have introduced the issue of race on the night of Henry’s murder. Police officers are trained not to treat everyone in the same way, and ‘colour blind’ policing is something that the guidance specifically condemns. As a result, the implementation of the guidance has forced all officers to actively view situations through a racial lens rather than an objective one – this distorts any immediate risk assessment at a crime scene by placing greater emphasis on issues of race and ethnicity rather than the traditional emphasis on risk. On the night of Henry Nowak’s murder, officers were clearly more concerned with the racial dynamics and the ‘optics’ of how they handled an ethnic minority suspect at the scene rather than the visible, life-threatening physical trauma being suffered by Henry Nowak. When the guidance talks of equity over equality, this is the real-world outcome. Equity is a white boy bleeding to death in handcuffs as police politely listen to his killer’s false claims.

Frontline policing experts have repeatedly noted that the Police Race Action Plan places an intense focus on racial politics and as a result it has created a ‘climate of fear’ on the streets for arresting officers. Police officers frequently second-guess their actions when dealing with minority individuals out of fear that using force or showing scepticism will be interpreted as a form of systemic bias. This leads to dramatic over-compensation and hesitation which in this case led to officers entirely deferring to Vickrum Digwa’s false narrative to avoid any perception of prejudice, resulting in the catastrophic failure to provide basic first aid to Henry Nowak as he lay dying in handcuffs. Just as Vickrum Digwa knew that his best option was to concoct a false narrative about ‘race’, the arresting officer knew they had to believe that narrative and act upon it immediately and decisively. Whilst the Police Race Action Plan talks about combatting “systemic bias”, instead it has created anti-white systemic bias in every aspect of policing; it is this bias that contributed to Henry Nowak’s death.

This all goes to prove that the operational doctrine found within the Police Race Action Plan is not only grossly flawed, but it is also anti-white and by extension creates a system of two-tier justice. By dictating that officers must “prioritise anti-racism work and take a zero-tolerance approach to racism”, the guidance grants an unbelievable privilege to those from an ethnic minority background. Once a person from an ethnic minority background makes the claim of racism at the scene of a crime, arresting officers are effectively duty bound to believe said claim and take it more seriously than any other physical evidence or testimony – with scepticism itself being the potential grounds for disciplinary action. This ensures that when the police are called, White Britons will always come off worse when they are engaged in a hostile interaction with someone from an ethnic minority background – and all because of guidance introduced by the Conservatives.

But shockingly, this strategic guidance and its implementation is not something that ceased to be under the control of the Conservative Party when they were voted out of power in the 2024 general election. On November 15^th 2012 the Conservative government introduced directly elected Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) in England and Wales following the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 becoming law. This new legislation replaced the old, unelected police authorities, with new directly elected PCCs who would serve four-year terms. Amongst other things, directly elected PCCs set local police strategy, control budgets and appoint and dismiss police chiefs. One of the way the Conservatives sold this new elected position was by telling the public that they would now be able to vote for a PCC and thus be able to influence how local policing would be managed. This means that even after 2024, the Conservatives, whilst no longer the party of governance, were in charge of a number of police constabularies.

Henry Nowak was murdered in Southampton, a city that falls under the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary. The directly elected PCC for this constabulary is Donna Jones. When the Police Race Action Plan was launched, she gushed with approval over the new strategic guidance, writing the following as part of a press release published on May 24^th 2022:

“The public expects policing to be proactive in tackling racism in all its forms; to support victims of hate crime; to be more effective at engaging with black and Asian minority ethnic communities; to be subject to proper scrutiny and, crucially, to expose and deal with any remaining people working in policing who are racist. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Constabulary is focused all of these things.

“The force continues to be proactive in rooting out all discriminatory behaviours, including racism. High profile cases help to evidence this. We are proud that recent examples have been exposed as a result of police officers and police staff reporting this vile behaviour.

“Being anti-racist, ethical and inclusive is top of our agenda. Our approach is ambitious and meets the expectation in the national plan, Hampshire Constabulary’s Race Action Plan, and the expectation set down by the Police and Crime Commissioner. We already have more than 500 advocates committed to tackling racism and we are training others to do the same. We welcome scrutiny in this area from independent representatives of our local communities and other independent bodies.”

It’s nice to know that Donna Jones’s top priority was not solving crime, but instead committing her constabulary to strategic guidance that helped kill a white boy and ensure that his final moments were more harrowing and humiliating than they otherwise would have been. But interestingly, had that quote not been attributed to a Conservative, the average and undiscerning reader may well incorrectly conclude that it had been penned by a member of the Labour Party or the Liberal Democrats. This raises another important and glaring issue: that the Conservatives are not just stumbling through a political minefield of liberal policy; going with the flow in order to ensure they are not blown to pieces for opposing legislation they don’t actually agree with. That would of course be merely cowardly. Instead, it is worse: the Conservatives are just as eager to pass anti-white policy as their supposed counterparts in Labour, and what’s more; they will cheer on such policy, enthusiastically embracing it and championing it at every opportunity.

On June 2nd 2026, after the conclusion of the trial of Vickrum Digwa for the murder of Henry Nowak, and without a hint of irony, Donna Jones released a statement in relation to circumstances surrounding Henry Nowak’s death. On the website of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary a press release stated:

[Donna Jones] The PCC has also said the Inspectorate should examine the training provided to frontline officers responding to knife crime incidents, including the application of immediate first aid, and the physiological presentation of serious internal bleeding.

The adequacy and regularity of that training will also be reviewed, and how officers are trained to triage competing accounts at the scene of a violent incident. Specifically, whether the provision of immediate medical assistance is treated as an unconditional duty that operates independently of any assessment of culpability.

Maybe she is suffering from amnesia, but Ms Jones seems to have forgotten that it was in fact the national strategic guidance that she embraced and championed so enthusiastically that helped contribute to the death of Henry Nowak. It was the very guidance that Donna Jones cheered on that forced officers to humiliate and degrade Henry Nowak as he was dying. But the Conservatives hope that will all be forgotten, as now “being anti-racist, ethical and inclusive” is no longer top of the agenda. As it is now time for the Conservatives to put on the ‘anti-woke’ mask and rebrand themselves as the solution to the problem they in fact created. And of course, as Labour happens to be in power, it is all too easy to imply that this is a problem of their making. Please note however, that whilst this national guidance was not passed under a Labour government, I am sure that every sitting Labour MP absolutely approves of it, and in no way should this be seen as an endorsement of the Labour Party or the suggestion that they are in anyway a ‘better option’ than the Conservatives when it comes to passing policy.

Interestingly, these two paragraphs lifted from Donna Jones’s press release reveal a shocking piece of information relating to the current police guidance; that the provision of immediate medical assistance is not treated as an unconditional duty. In other words, immediate medical assistance is, thanks to the Police Race Action Plan, a secondary consideration to police officers attending a crime scene if an allegation of ‘racism’ has been made. This admission literally states that saving the life of a white person is less important to police than the allegation that said white person may have said something of a racially charged nature to a member of an ethnic minority community. Such an assertion would once have been described as dangerous hyperbole or even a conspiracy theory, but here it is, in writing, as part of a press release issued on an official government website for an elected PCC. And crucially, this is the work of the Conservative Party.

But there is one other interesting issue relating to Donna Jones – as mentioned earlier, as PCC for the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary she has the power to appoint and dismiss the Police Chief. The current Police Chief for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight is Alexis Boon – a man selected and appointed by Donna Jones. In the wake of the murder of Henry Nowak, Alexis Boon has been extremely vocal in defending the police force and has strongly rejected allegations of two-tier policing or systemic bias. Whilst Boon issued a formal apology to the family of Henry Nowak, he firmly denied that the case pointed to a deeper structural failure or anti-white bias within law enforcement, going as far as to state “I don’t accept the term of two-tier policing, I don’t recognise it”. Further to this, when asked if he believed UK policing has become anti-white due to its anti-racism policies, Alexis Boon replied, “No, I don’t.” Will Donna Jones use her power to dismiss Alexis Boon? Only time will tell, but if the Conservatives did truly care about this case, the first step would be to appoint a Police Chief who at least acknowledged that the problem of anti-white two-tier justice actually exists.

The Conservative Party is no longer the party of governance; they are the official opposition. As such, they are attempting to rebrand themselves as the party that rejects ‘woke’ politics. The irony is, that it was the Conservative Party that passed the legislation and implemented the national guidelines that helped to seal Henry Nowak’s fate. The Conservative Party may not have stabbed Henry Nowak to death, but they ensured that his killer was legally able to walk the streets with the knife that was used as a murder weapon – whilst at the same time banning White Britons from owning similar daggers and weapons even within the privacy of their own homes! It was also not the Conservative party that placed the handcuffs on Henry Nowak’s blood-drained wrists, but it was national guidance drafted and implemented under their rule that effectively forced the police officers attending the scene of his stabbing to do so.

Kemi Badenoch is attempting to position herself and her party as crusaders for colour-blind justice and common-sense policing, but the fact is that it was Conservative Party policies and legislation that led to the death of Henry Nowak – something she is careful not to mention. Worse still, Henry Nowak died in a police constabulary that is overseen by a Conservative PCC – an issue that is now compounded by the fact that the local Police Chief appears to be doubling-down on the very guidance that led to the inhumane treatment of Henry Nowak at the hands of local officers. The tragic death of Henry Nowak not only exposes anti-white two-tier justice, but shines a light on the fact that Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives are nothing more than political opportunists who will say whatever they need to in order to gain power, whilst refusing to ever acknowledge that they in fact passed the policy which created the problem at hand.

Whilst both Labour and the Conservatives are in many ways equally horrible, there is something about the Conservative Party that makes it arguably worse than the Labour Party. Whilst generally people know what they are getting with Labour – they expect a Labour government to be more liberal, to be more left-leaning on issues of race, immigration and nationality – many people are routinely fooled by the Conservatives. There are still people out there who think that Kemi Badenoch is the one who could sort this mess out – whilst being blissfully ignorant over the fact that she was happy to vote through legislation that strengthened laws which allowed Henry Nowak’s killer to walk the streets legally bearing weapons. Badenoch will now continue to reinvent herself as the ‘anti-woke crusader’ who can save Britain – despite the fact that it is her party that has passed some of the worst anti-white legislation and currently holds the record for the highest level of net migration this country has ever witnessed.

The same politicians who once crowed about the Police Race Action Plan and cheered on legislation that carved out exceptions that allowed an armed Sikh to legally walk the streets before murdering a white boy are now crying crocodile tears, calling for enquiries and claiming that it is the Conservatives who offer the solution. There is an old criticism of the Conservatives; that they conserve nothing. This however is far too kind, as the Conservatives are often the party that passes the most appalling legislation. The Conservative Party is not the solution to the problem of anti-white two-tier justice – quite the opposite, they are the architects of the legislation that brought it about. To suggest that the solution to a problem can be found amongst those who created the problem in the first place is as laughable as it is insulting. As such, Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives deserve to be confined to the history books just as much as Keir Starmer and the Labour Party.