Making the moral descision to support Palestinians in their struggle against Zionist terror should never mean that nationalists ignore the suffering of Europeans at the hands of Muslim migrants.
As Will Wright writes it is difficult to explain the different positions & personally I have given up trying, but Mark has managed in this article to outline the whole desperate situation clearly & correctly. God help us all - this is a terrible situation that we find ourselves in. What we must understand is that it has not just happened- it’s all by design.
If Germany had won the war this would not be happening. I’ll leave it at that.
Thank you for providing the summary statements at the beginning of the post. Please continue doing so. I love your writing: clear, documented and well thought out but necessarily longer in form. It helps me understand more fully your point when I know where you are going as I read your writing. Plus knowing your conclusions informs me even if I can’t finish the whole article due to the inevitable interruptions of work and family.
The grooming gangs were not Muslim, they were Pakistani. Those men were not motivated by Islam. We know this because the majority of Muslims in the UK are not part of a grooming gang. Instead of meeting working class White people where they are, you have to educate them as to who the real enemy is. Counter-jihad is a Jewish rhetorical strategy to deflect energy from so-called Muslim crime into Zionism. You cannot 'use' Jewish strategies as a path to victory for Whites—especially when they come in the form of counter-jihad slop movies like the one you were promoting.
You are clearly happy to wave away the fact that some of these gangs were run by Afghans and Syrians. Also, you wilfully ignore the fact that in some European countries such as France and Spain the problem of sexual assaults on white women and girls is centred around Morroccans and Algerians. There are incidents like the organised mass sexual assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015 into 2016 involving gangs of predominantly young men of North African and Arab descent. Or what about the fact that Wahhabist Mosques have been breeding grounds for terrorism and organised anti-Western activity. Muslims are welcome to their own nations, but they don’t mix well with Europeans.
By Mark’s own statements here, all of these crimes are done by “racial others”. IE…not European. So he should accurately describe them as “racial others” and not use religious labels to describe them. This is the easy and obvious point that everyone is making. The fact that he seems completely unable to grasp it, and insists on attacking straw men instead is making me scratch my head.
I agree that Muslims should live in their own countries (unmolested by Judeo-America). Now you can respond to my actual point instead of stepping over it.
I dealt with your point in the article. It takes people years to get the issue of Israeli power and Zionist influence. It's not something people can be educated about with a leaflet. Most people who talk about these issues are part of a political niche of extremely well read people. You have to reach people over the issues they understand, and still only a tiny number of them will ever get the final issue. That is the same with immigration, demographics and other issues.
If I am reading this comment correctly…Mark is saying that he uses “Muslim” as a place holder for “racial other”. He does this not because it is true, but because most people are not intelligent or well educated enough to understand the real issues. I completely and utterly disagree with this strategy and this point of view.
I think a vast amount of normal people are waking up to the Jewish problem. It takes years to come around if there isn't someone explaining why you are wrong. We have to proselytise our truth otherwise what's the point in any of this?
Well done, Mark! You put the Racial Nationalist position in perspective, so called Rightists may think that we are pro-Third Worldist but they are captured by Zionist interests. If anyone says that they are Nationalists and disagree with your article, then they are not our guys!!
Best regards from Sepp, Sydney Prison Gulag of Australia
Remember that one of the rape gang leaders was a Sikh.
The issue isn't whether or not to address the nonwhite rape gangs, it's whether or not to pretend it's a Muslim problem rather than a racial invader problem. Letting it be framed as even partially an Islam problem lets Zionists get away with pulling a fast one on victimized white people, which morphs our kin into agents of their own destruction and supporters of the most disgusting and open genocide in the history of humanity.
The fact is, the left is no more anti-white than the right, and being stuck in a left vs right paradigm means being stuck in a false paradigm that guarantees you will never get what you want.
Whites need to be able to choose their own friends and enemies, and that isn't possible without breaking out of this kind of framing.
This is so well articulated and so appreciated to hear it from Mark, it was a relief to read. I have been having this conversations with myself in my head over recent months as I listen to some pro-white people praising muslims and Islam. Its really difficult to listen to, whereas Mark here strikes the perfect balance.
Not "grooming gangs". The MSM cunningly softens the crimes of these men by nudging "grooming gangs" into everyday use. This is a deliberately (by the "system") ambiguous phrase
as it can have different interpretations. It was nudged in in order to get these non-white paedophiles off the hook.
The fact is that they are AntiWhite paedophile gangs (collectively) and AntiWhite paedophiles individually. Of course some girls of non-white races also get these particular paedophiles abusing them too but that is collateral damage, the target being White girls.
If anyone tries to argue otherwise then they should give Savile, Gary Glitter etc the same privilege of just being called "groomers". If it's appropriate to call the White monsters Savile, Glitter etc paedophiles then it applies exactly the same to non-white monsters.
Awakening of the masses is irrelevant without elite backing. Do we have that? I don’t see it. The best we have is Lowe and Musk. Both are zionusts. Things have to get a lot worse, and they will.
Most great replacement immigration to the UK these days is made up of non-Muslims from Nigeria, India, Zimbabwe and China yet the British white nationalist blogger and podcaster sphere seldom talks about that because Jews will throw you in jail if you do. Guess cheerleading Patrick Bet David, Elon Musk, and Tommy Robinson’s retread of a distorted version of the 2012 Rotherham scandal (many South Asian and black non-Muslims molest and sex traffic white girls as well) because Zionists need a whataboutist distraction from Epstein or Israel is your unimaginative plan b.
"the places which have become a sea of Palestinian flags are areas where the White British people have been replaced and have become a persecuted minority"
Is this even true? The polling data that I've seen, at least for the US, shows that young Whites are overwhelmingly pro-Palestine. Additionally, there are many countries with very few muslims where the population is very pro-palestine. One example is Japan. Another example is North Korea, where the government is also fanatically pro-palestine and has zero muslims.
Even if it were the case that White people were insufficiently pro-palestine, wouldn't it be the right response to try to make White people better? Why cast blame onto other groups for being pro-palestine, instead of using this as an opportunity for self-improvement and self-reflection?
Hundreds of thousands of White British girls raped by Pakistani Muslims (and other Muslims took part in this) but White Britons need to improve themselves and become more pro-Palestine? How about the Muslim men stop raping white girls and the wider Muslim community stops protecting and sheltering the rapists. Maybe then Europeans wouldn't view them so negatively.
I don't think white people are insufficiently pro-palestine, I raised this as a hypothetical. And I stand by this position, that if whites are taking an immoral position, it's your responsibility as a party leader to improve them and guide them to the right path.
I also don't see how Palestine has anything to do with rape gangs, since I think none of the perpetrators were Palestinians (or Iranians or Lebanese). Sure, the people doing the rape gangs were Muslims, but this is a global religion like Christianity with many distinct subgroups. Most black criminals in the US or Europe are Christian, but do we identify this as their salient characteristic?
In any case, do you agree with my argument that whites are more pro-palestine than non-whites? Globally, this is definitely the case. When I took a trip to Iceland about a year ago I saw tons of pro-palestine murals and flags and very few non-whites.
"But shockingly, certain so-called ‘White Nationalists’ are mirroring the British state – demanding that white working-class families shut their mouths over issues pertaining to the abuse that white girls have suffered at the hands of Muslim men."
Dude you have Eric Striker and the TRS Guys and people in this very comment section talking about how "They´re not really muslism" and making it as if this is all a conspiracy to set whites against muslims and portraying these mudslimes as if they were innocent bystanders, you yourself are contributing to this
Eric Striker is pointing out that most non-White immigration to the UK are non-Muslims and most non-White crimes are committed by non-Muslims, especially blacks. The 2012 Rotherham scandal is almost always brought up in bad faith by Zionists to distract from the larger jewish run anti-White system and to direct White discontent into supporting Zionist politics. You haven't addressed any of this.
A very good article, which covers all the important points. Mark Collett is right about everything he writes here.
It can be difficult explaining the various positions, but he has done that successfully.
Well done, Mark!
As Will Wright writes it is difficult to explain the different positions & personally I have given up trying, but Mark has managed in this article to outline the whole desperate situation clearly & correctly. God help us all - this is a terrible situation that we find ourselves in. What we must understand is that it has not just happened- it’s all by design.
If Germany had won the war this would not be happening. I’ll leave it at that.
Yes well done Mark 🙏
Thank you for providing the summary statements at the beginning of the post. Please continue doing so. I love your writing: clear, documented and well thought out but necessarily longer in form. It helps me understand more fully your point when I know where you are going as I read your writing. Plus knowing your conclusions informs me even if I can’t finish the whole article due to the inevitable interruptions of work and family.
Great read Mark. The more I educate myself on this the more I see what is happening before my eyes.
The grooming gangs were not Muslim, they were Pakistani. Those men were not motivated by Islam. We know this because the majority of Muslims in the UK are not part of a grooming gang. Instead of meeting working class White people where they are, you have to educate them as to who the real enemy is. Counter-jihad is a Jewish rhetorical strategy to deflect energy from so-called Muslim crime into Zionism. You cannot 'use' Jewish strategies as a path to victory for Whites—especially when they come in the form of counter-jihad slop movies like the one you were promoting.
You are clearly happy to wave away the fact that some of these gangs were run by Afghans and Syrians. Also, you wilfully ignore the fact that in some European countries such as France and Spain the problem of sexual assaults on white women and girls is centred around Morroccans and Algerians. There are incidents like the organised mass sexual assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015 into 2016 involving gangs of predominantly young men of North African and Arab descent. Or what about the fact that Wahhabist Mosques have been breeding grounds for terrorism and organised anti-Western activity. Muslims are welcome to their own nations, but they don’t mix well with Europeans.
By Mark’s own statements here, all of these crimes are done by “racial others”. IE…not European. So he should accurately describe them as “racial others” and not use religious labels to describe them. This is the easy and obvious point that everyone is making. The fact that he seems completely unable to grasp it, and insists on attacking straw men instead is making me scratch my head.
I agree that Muslims should live in their own countries (unmolested by Judeo-America). Now you can respond to my actual point instead of stepping over it.
I dealt with your point in the article. It takes people years to get the issue of Israeli power and Zionist influence. It's not something people can be educated about with a leaflet. Most people who talk about these issues are part of a political niche of extremely well read people. You have to reach people over the issues they understand, and still only a tiny number of them will ever get the final issue. That is the same with immigration, demographics and other issues.
If I am reading this comment correctly…Mark is saying that he uses “Muslim” as a place holder for “racial other”. He does this not because it is true, but because most people are not intelligent or well educated enough to understand the real issues. I completely and utterly disagree with this strategy and this point of view.
I think a vast amount of normal people are waking up to the Jewish problem. It takes years to come around if there isn't someone explaining why you are wrong. We have to proselytise our truth otherwise what's the point in any of this?
Well done, Mark! You put the Racial Nationalist position in perspective, so called Rightists may think that we are pro-Third Worldist but they are captured by Zionist interests. If anyone says that they are Nationalists and disagree with your article, then they are not our guys!!
Best regards from Sepp, Sydney Prison Gulag of Australia
Mark is showing great leadership with this article... as usual.
What amazes me is how the Jews get all of us goyim, coming and going.
They leverage American (and to a lesser extent, Western) money and weapons to go after the Palestinians and various other easy targets.
Then they weaponize Third World peoples against us in the West through their machinations to bring about replacement level immigration.
It's the perfect Jewish strategy - they get all the Gentiles fighting against each other, with an end goal of Jewish dominance over us all.
We have to keep our heads about what is going on. And this article really spells that out.
excellent
Remember that one of the rape gang leaders was a Sikh.
The issue isn't whether or not to address the nonwhite rape gangs, it's whether or not to pretend it's a Muslim problem rather than a racial invader problem. Letting it be framed as even partially an Islam problem lets Zionists get away with pulling a fast one on victimized white people, which morphs our kin into agents of their own destruction and supporters of the most disgusting and open genocide in the history of humanity.
The fact is, the left is no more anti-white than the right, and being stuck in a left vs right paradigm means being stuck in a false paradigm that guarantees you will never get what you want.
Whites need to be able to choose their own friends and enemies, and that isn't possible without breaking out of this kind of framing.
This is so well articulated and so appreciated to hear it from Mark, it was a relief to read. I have been having this conversations with myself in my head over recent months as I listen to some pro-white people praising muslims and Islam. Its really difficult to listen to, whereas Mark here strikes the perfect balance.
Not "grooming gangs". The MSM cunningly softens the crimes of these men by nudging "grooming gangs" into everyday use. This is a deliberately (by the "system") ambiguous phrase
as it can have different interpretations. It was nudged in in order to get these non-white paedophiles off the hook.
The fact is that they are AntiWhite paedophile gangs (collectively) and AntiWhite paedophiles individually. Of course some girls of non-white races also get these particular paedophiles abusing them too but that is collateral damage, the target being White girls.
If anyone tries to argue otherwise then they should give Savile, Gary Glitter etc the same privilege of just being called "groomers". If it's appropriate to call the White monsters Savile, Glitter etc paedophiles then it applies exactly the same to non-white monsters.
Awakening of the masses is irrelevant without elite backing. Do we have that? I don’t see it. The best we have is Lowe and Musk. Both are zionusts. Things have to get a lot worse, and they will.
Britain for the British, Lebanon for the Lebanese, a quarantined segment of Madagascar for world jewry.
Most great replacement immigration to the UK these days is made up of non-Muslims from Nigeria, India, Zimbabwe and China yet the British white nationalist blogger and podcaster sphere seldom talks about that because Jews will throw you in jail if you do. Guess cheerleading Patrick Bet David, Elon Musk, and Tommy Robinson’s retread of a distorted version of the 2012 Rotherham scandal (many South Asian and black non-Muslims molest and sex traffic white girls as well) because Zionists need a whataboutist distraction from Epstein or Israel is your unimaginative plan b.
"the places which have become a sea of Palestinian flags are areas where the White British people have been replaced and have become a persecuted minority"
Is this even true? The polling data that I've seen, at least for the US, shows that young Whites are overwhelmingly pro-Palestine. Additionally, there are many countries with very few muslims where the population is very pro-palestine. One example is Japan. Another example is North Korea, where the government is also fanatically pro-palestine and has zero muslims.
Even if it were the case that White people were insufficiently pro-palestine, wouldn't it be the right response to try to make White people better? Why cast blame onto other groups for being pro-palestine, instead of using this as an opportunity for self-improvement and self-reflection?
What an abhorrent comment.
Hundreds of thousands of White British girls raped by Pakistani Muslims (and other Muslims took part in this) but White Britons need to improve themselves and become more pro-Palestine? How about the Muslim men stop raping white girls and the wider Muslim community stops protecting and sheltering the rapists. Maybe then Europeans wouldn't view them so negatively.
I don't think white people are insufficiently pro-palestine, I raised this as a hypothetical. And I stand by this position, that if whites are taking an immoral position, it's your responsibility as a party leader to improve them and guide them to the right path.
I also don't see how Palestine has anything to do with rape gangs, since I think none of the perpetrators were Palestinians (or Iranians or Lebanese). Sure, the people doing the rape gangs were Muslims, but this is a global religion like Christianity with many distinct subgroups. Most black criminals in the US or Europe are Christian, but do we identify this as their salient characteristic?
In any case, do you agree with my argument that whites are more pro-palestine than non-whites? Globally, this is definitely the case. When I took a trip to Iceland about a year ago I saw tons of pro-palestine murals and flags and very few non-whites.
"But shockingly, certain so-called ‘White Nationalists’ are mirroring the British state – demanding that white working-class families shut their mouths over issues pertaining to the abuse that white girls have suffered at the hands of Muslim men."
This is a strawman, this is a lie.
Dude you have Eric Striker and the TRS Guys and people in this very comment section talking about how "They´re not really muslism" and making it as if this is all a conspiracy to set whites against muslims and portraying these mudslimes as if they were innocent bystanders, you yourself are contributing to this
Who isn't really muslim?
Eric Striker is pointing out that most non-White immigration to the UK are non-Muslims and most non-White crimes are committed by non-Muslims, especially blacks. The 2012 Rotherham scandal is almost always brought up in bad faith by Zionists to distract from the larger jewish run anti-White system and to direct White discontent into supporting Zionist politics. You haven't addressed any of this.
Incorrect.
The highest arrest rates for sexual offences per capita for foreign nationals by country of origin are as follows (in order of highest to lowest):
Sudan (Muslim)
Afghanistan (Muslim)
Eritrea (Split evenly between Christian and Muslim)
Iran (Muslim)
Iraq (Muslim)
Guinea (Muslim)
Tunisia (Muslim)
Namibia (Christian)
Gambia (Muslim)
Kuwait (Muslim)
That is just the top ten...
Are there any settlements in Gaza? I thought they left it entirely to the PA which was then subsequently overthrown by a Hamas coup…