A Coherent Take on Grooming Gangs, Palestine and Zionism

Making the moral descision to support Palestinians in their struggle against Zionist terror should never mean that nationalists ignore the suffering of Europeans at the hands of Muslim migrants.

For those who don’t like reading lengthy articles and for those who just want a summary of my position on this, I will start with a few bullet points:

I support the Palestinian cause and believe that Palestinians have a right to live within their ancestral homeland, free of Zionist terror.

I support sovereign Middle-Eastern nations in their ongoing conflict against both the Judeo-American state and the state of Israel, both of which have brought terror and destabilisation to the region.

I wish for the constituent nations of the British Isles to remain overwhelmingly homogenous and to be ruled by the indigenous people for the benefit of the indigenous people, free from foreign influence and Zionist control.

I will continue to highlight and campaign against anti-white crime including the widespread issue of grooming, rape and sexual assault carried out by men from migrant backgrounds. White Britons should never be reduced to a hated and persecuted minority in their ancestral homeland.

From an ethno-nationalist perspective two ideals are held up above all else: homogeneity and national self-determination. Distinct and individual cultural and ethnic groups possess an inherent, inalienable right to remain a super majority within their ancestral homelands and to hold sovereignty over the land, resources and people within their national borders. This is what ethno-nationalists within the British Isles strive toward – for the indigenous people of the constituent nations of the British Isles to remain stable majorities and for the respective ethnic groups that inhabit those nations to be in complete control of their own affairs. The English, the Scots, the Welsh and the Irish should not only be free from the threat of becoming a minority and losing their culture and traditions, but they should also be free from foreign rule and allowed to govern their own nations to their own benefit. What’s more, this right is not limited to the inhabitants of the British Isles or to Europeans, but extends to all other racial and ethnic groups.

Further to this, and contrary to the post-Second World War narrative, nationalism is not an ideology that seeks conflict. Nationalism rejects foreign interventions or wars of aggression and occupation. Ethno-nationalists believe it is not the place of any group to invade another’s homeland or to impose their will on another, whether that be through military force or through acts of subversion. Every nation has a right to defend and police its own borders, but no nation has the right to engage in acts of aggression and dominate another. As a result, ethno-nationalists have rejected modern American imperialism and campaigned vociferously against Western interventions in the Middle East and invasions of sovereign nations.

Nationalists seek global stability and believe that such stability is best maintained when distinct populations occupy defined geographic homelands, thereby avoiding both the demographic pressures and the cultural and ethnic conflicts associated with forced and unnatural multicultural societies. Every distinct ethnic group has a place in the world, but that place is not on the same street in the same small town in the same European country. By occupying defined and ethnically homogenous homelands, conflict is avoided as different groups can behave in the way they see fit without cultural tensions arising. Conversely, by reducing or completely eliminating geographic distance globalists bring different ethnic groups into conflict with one another over issues pertaining to resource allocation and cultural differences. The best way to summarise this in a simple and concise way is to cite the old adage: good fences make good neighbours.

Consequently, if European nationalists wish for European nations to live in peace and control their own affairs and borders, it is absolutely correct and morally sound for those nationalists to support the Palestinians in their struggle against the state of Israel. A sovereign Palestinian state is the right of the Palestinian people who have lived on that land for centuries, and as such this necessitates the cessation of Israeli military occupation and the reversal of settlement expansion in both Gaza and the West Bank. What’s more, as nationalists do not endorse Western military interventions, it is imperative that Western support and military aid for Israel is halted immediately. Further to this, as nationalists do not endorse foreign rule or outside meddling and subversion in the affairs of sovereign nations, Israeli lobby groups in the West should be investigated as hostile foreign agents as they have deliberately and underhandedly subverted Western politics at the behest of a hostile foreign entity which has dragged Western countries into a series of unnecessary and unjust conflicts.

Nationalism is also a moral movement because nationalists oppose the use of force to subdue and subjugate sovereign populations in order to allow an invasive group to claim land that is not rightfully theirs. As a result of this, it is correct for nationalists to call on Western nations to place sanctions on Israel, the Israeli government and Israeli military leaders for the war crimes they have committed against the Palestinian people. Additionally, Western nations should comply with the International Criminal Court in order to help bring those to justice who have directed genocide against the Palestinian people. It becomes more obvious with each passing day that Israel’s actions in Palestine and in other Middle Eastern nations amounts to genocide due to the specific and repeated targeting of civilian homes and infrastructure and the deliberate denial of both food and medical aid to those fleeing the conflict – this should not be ignored, forgotten or minimised.

At this juncture it must be explained why Western nations do not impose sanctions on Israel and why Western leaders will at best turn a blind eye to Israeli aggression and at worst cheer it on. Quite simply, Israel and the Zionist lobby – through organisations like AIPAC – have completely distorted American and Western foreign policy. Israel has influenced Western politicians with financial bribes and through a scheme of well-funded and regular trips to Israel which whisk Western politicians away to the Zionist state. Exactly what goes on during these trips is largely shrouded in mystery – above the water line these trips may appear to be simple fact-finding excursions, below the water line they are likely to involve all manner of incentives aimed at buying the support of those in attendance. Worse still is that when these bribes don’t work the same powerful lobby groups then resort to well-funded smear campaigns – ruining the political careers of those who refuse to bow to Israel. Israel’s dual approach of controlling Western politicians brings to mind the brazen tactics of former drug lord Pablo Escobar who famously offered Columbian officials the choice of silver or lead – officials either came on board or their life came to abrupt end, it is similar with Western politicians, they accept the bribe or their career is ruined and they are replaced by a much more Israel-friendly individual.

Finally, it must be noted that Israel is absolutely willing to work outside of any established moral framework when it comes to controlling foreign politicians, dignitaries and other important individuals who are key figures in either the private or public sector. The Israeli state is well known for employing illegal, underhanded and coercive methods which involve both blackmail and sexual honey-trap operations. Most notably, the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell honey-trap operation was a clear and obvious example of the way those working for Israel can gain access to the highest levels of Western leadership with the sole intention of compromising those caught up in the sting and then leveraging power over them for the benefit of Israel. This particular operation affected both Britain and America, with key British political figures like Lord Mandelson being alleged to have passed state secrets to Epstein to allow for insider trading. Exactly whether Mandelson was bribed or whether he felt an ethnic kinship to Epstein and Israel is immaterial, as the result remains the same.

But European nationalists should not just support the Palestinian cause for moral reasons. From a European racial perspective there are also a number of extremely valid and self-serving reasons to support the Palestinian cause. Most notably, if Zionists get their way and achieve their end goal of a ‘greater Israel’, millions of Palestinians and other Arabs will be displaced. Many of these people will head to Europe and will of course be welcomed by European governments. Whilst European ethno-nationalists should support Palestinians in Palestine, Iranians in Iran, Syrians in Syria and so on, they should absolutely oppose these people moving to Europe – as the widespread displacement of people from the Middle East to European nations would shift the demographic balance across Europe even further in the wrong direction, speeding the minority status of indigenous European populations. As such, a home for the Palestinian people in Palestine is the morally correct stance, a stance which is in line with the ethno-nationalist belief that all peoples of the world deserve a home. But a home for the Palestinian people in Palestine is also the correct stance from the perspective of those who care about demographic change in Europe and wish to see Europeans remain a majority in their ancestral homelands.

Foreign wars in the Middle East have never helped Europeans. The claim that Israel is Europe’s ‘last line of defence’ is an outright lie. Not only do these wars cost astronomical sums of money and have resulted in a constant stream of wooden boxes being flown back to the West, but there is always a massive human cost in the countries where these wars are waged. This human cost is not just the loss of life from direct violence. Beyond the direct and immediate conflict there is the destruction of residential property, infrastructure and the severing of supply chains that deliver food, water and essential medical care. Not only do these issues cause the death toll to continue to rise long after the bombs have stopped falling, but they lead to a massive number of people being displaced. The displaced people then head to Europe, and when they arrive, they not only contribute to the demographic replacement of Europeans, but they also create untold problems and pose a very specific threat to European women and girls.

Many of those who arrive on European shores are men of fighting age, and they also happen to be overwhelmingly Muslim. These men, per capita, are massively over represented in crime figures for sexual assault and rape. According to government figures, Afghans, Iraqis, Iranians and Syrians are all between eight and twenty times more likely to be arrested for a sexual offence than White British men. On top of the aforementioned issues, there is also the well documented issue of the grooming gangs – where over one hundred thousand White British girls were systematically sexually abused, raped, trafficked and even murdered by men who were overwhelmingly of Pakistani Muslim descent. The principal difference between those from the Middle East and those from Pakistan is that the later arrived in Britain legally to work in factories and mills. But whether migrants have arrived in the UK legally, illegally or as ‘asylum seekers’ is immaterial, as these waves of immigration have impacted White British communities negatively. Specifically Islamic immigration has completely transformed many areas of British towns and cities, which have now become hostile places for White Britons.

Not only do White Britons feel completely out of place in many parts of Britain thanks to mass immigration, but White Britons are no longer safe in the areas where they have become a minority. The most glaring issue is that of the grooming scandal – a sexual crime epidemic carried out overwhelmingly by Pakistani Muslim men and covered up by almost every arm of the British state, but principally by the police and social services. As stated earlier, over one hundred thousand White British girls have been sexually assaulted, raped, trafficked and even murdered by these gangs. But the issue extends beyond the gang members, as the families and surrounding communities have largely supported the actions of the perpetrators, either turning a blind eye to or actively covering up the most sickening criminality and in some cases attacking and blaming the white victims. Elsewhere in Europe similar sexual assaults and rapes have occurred at the hands of Syrians, Afghans and other men who are mainly Muslim.

Thanks to mass immigration parts of British towns and cities such as Bradford, Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford have changed to such a degree that the shops, street signs, community centres and religious buildings are now all foreign to the indigenous population. And in these Muslim parts of towns and cities, Palestinian flags can often be seen flying from lampposts, hung in shop windows and are displayed on vehicles. However, despite the supposedly anti-Zionist messaging, this is not something that should be celebrated. In fact, quite the opposite, the places which have become a sea of Palestinian flags are areas where the White British people have been replaced and have become a persecuted minority. Worse still, in many cases, the same communities that can be seen flying the Palestinian flag are the ones from which the grooming gangs emerged. That is why the Palestinian flag causes so much revulsion from white working-class communities – they immediately associate the flag with the people who have preyed upon their sisters and daughters.

As such, seeing the Palestinian flag being flown over towns like Rotherham shouldn’t fill any white nationalist with joy, as it is being flown over a town where thousands of White British girls were groomed, raped and trafficked over a decades long campaign of state sanctioned abuse – and it is being flown by the very people who were happy to rape and abuse white females. When white fathers see Palestinian flags on the rear bumpers of the taxis that picked up their daughters and drove them to takeaways so they could be drugged and raped, is it any wonder that those white fathers have such a strong negative reaction when seeing that flag? Thanks to the behaviour of Muslims in Western nations, many people who are opposed to immigration are unfortunately now unlikely to support those in Lebanon, Palestine and Iran in their struggle against their Zionist oppressors. Worse still, some white men will instinctively take up the Israeli flag as a perceived protest against those who fly the Palestinian flag. This very phenomenon can also be seen in Northern Ireland, where the Catholic community began flying the Palestinian flag, and in response the Protestant community adopted the Israeli flag.

It is easy for online commentators to scoff at white working-class men and women for not understanding the role Israel has played in causing mass immigration into the West or for not knowing that powerful Zionist lobbies often play a key role in relaxing migration legislation. But the fact is that most people are simply not invested enough in politics to understand the root cause of the problem, instead they merely focus on the symptom – which is in itself an egregious problem that makes life a misery for many white families. Reaching out to these white people is difficult; they have been victimised, abused, ignored and even silenced by state power whilst those who have abused them have been placed on a pedestal and been given every advantage the government could bestow upon them. The resentment and divide between White Britons and Muslim communities is huge. But as European ethno-nationalists, it is important to look at the situation and acknowledge that although we understand the bigger picture, we represent a white victim class who do not, and we have a duty to advocate for those white victims and to campaign on their behalf.

It goes without saying that many of the problems faced by Western nations can be traced back to the deep-rooted Zionist control of both political structures, public institutions and the media. But for normal white folk, the immediate issue is that they are in constant ethnic conflict with their Muslim neighbours. Going into a white working-class community and telling the people living there that they should end their valid criticisms of a group that has been preying upon them because that group is opposed to Israel is little or no different to what the British state did during the grooming gang cover-up. The British state always put the Muslim community first and actively silenced White British girls and their families in order to protect Muslims; mainly because politicians wanted the electoral support of the highly organised Muslim community, but also because the acknowledgement of the widespread sexual abuse of white girls at the hands of foreign men was a damning indictment of multiculturalism.

But shockingly, certain so-called ‘White Nationalists’ are mirroring the British state – demanding that white working-class families shut their mouths over issues pertaining to the abuse that white girls have suffered at the hands of Muslim men. This is not because these ‘White Nationalists’ are in favour of multiculturalism, but instead because they have put the Muslim community on a pedestal as ‘anti-Zionists’ and they naively hope for some form of grand alliance with those Muslims in respect to the issue of Israel and Zionist power. Whilst the idea of supporting Palestinians in Palestine, Iranians in Iran and the Lebanese in Lebanon in their struggle against Israel is absolutely inline with ethno-nationalist ideals, the idea that White British victims of Pakistani Muslim rape gangs operating in Britain should shut up and effectively take the knee to Muslim men because those men fly the Palestinian flag is not only abhorrent, but it is a cowardly betrayal of our racial brothers and sisters. To even suggest an alliance with those who are happy to prey on vulnerable white girls is not only a shocking capitulation but also a barometer of how low certain people within the White Nationalist movement have sunk.

The counter argument to this is that nationalists must address the root-cause of the problem and expose the people who brought Muslims to the West. Some assert that the problem of the rape gangs can never and will never be solved until Western folk have freed themselves from the foreign influence that has dragged their nations into foreign wars and coerced them into opening their borders. This on the surface appears to be sound logic – but on closer inspection fundamentally fails to either understand or acknowledge how humans think and behave. Most people who come to nationalism go on a journey. That journey often starts when they experience an issue that affects them negatively and they correctly identify that the problem in question is down stream of immigration. The grooming issue fits this perfectly; White British families and communities understand that they are negatively impacted by living alongside Pakistani Muslims and that immigration brought the problem to their town.

At this point people begin to oppose immigration and some will begin to link immigration to demographic change – raising the concern that if current trends continue, White Britons will become a minority. The reasoning then follows, that if things are this bad now, they will be much worse in 20 years when there are more migrants and White Britons make up a smaller share of the population. This is part of a natural chain of political development and learning. For some however, this learning process will continue and the following questions will be asked: why is this immigration continuing and who is letting these people in? Why has this happened? Who does it benefit? Who is really running our country? Why do all Western nations follow this suicidal path? Only then can nationalists introduce the bigger picture to these curious truth seekers, at this point the people are ready to understand the threat of Zionism and learn that Western governments and the Western media are no longer controlled by those who have the West’s best interests at heart.

The idea that nationalists can go into white working-class communities and scream “shut up” at those who have been victimised by grooming gangs and foreign rapists because they are not talking about Zionism and Jewish power is absurd. This is one of the reasons why certain quarters of the nationalist movement have effectively ghettoised themselves and reduced their sphere of influence to tiny online echo chambers where streams that last for three hours are viewed by little more than a dozen people. Ethno-nationalists must understand that the awakening of people of European descent happens in stages, and if nationalists wish for those Europeans who are waking up to join them, they must help them through those stages – not insult them, not laugh at them and definitely not silence them and shame them when they are talking about their justified grievances and persecution at the hands of minority groups and the anti-white state.

But sadly, the desperation from some white nationalists goes further still, as some now assert that nationalists should form some kind of alliance with the left as well. To believe that nationalists can stand with ‘anti-racists’ who have spent their lives fighting to silence racially conscious white people and have actively worked to transform every Western nation into a series of deracinated, liberal, multicultural states is insane. This issue is compounded because those on the left fundamentally fail to understand what Israel really is. The white leftists standing shoulder to shoulder with Muslims to oppose the state of Israel do so not because Israel is a Zionist and Jewish supremacist state, but because they believe Israel is a white supremacist state and an American outpost in the region. These people are so indoctrinated with anti-white poison that they actually believe Israel is America’s pawn in the Middle East, rather than understanding the truth: that America is a pawn of Israel and is completely dominated by a Jewish power structure. What’s more, if you tried to explain the truth of the matter to these ‘progressives’ and attempted to tell them who actually controls the media and explain how Israel wields control over Western nations, they would likely contact the police and file a hate crime report. These people have fought tooth and nail to silence criticism of immigration and have done everything in their power to endorse the replacement of whites – and unless they repudiate those beliefs, they are worse than enemies; they are traitors to their own ethnic group.

For any white nationalist to declare that they wish to side with migrant men who abuse white girls or form an alliance with self-hating white liberals who wish for white replacement is nothing short of madness – a desperate and grovelling attempt to gain relevance by bowing to those who have wilfully harmed people of European descent. Instead, white nationalists should take the harder but more principled route – one that calls out both the abuse of white girls in the West and at the same time condemns Zionist terror in the Middle East. Nationalism must be a moral movement, one that stands firm on big issues, but also one that is welcoming to Europeans who are beginning their journey of political and racial awakening. One thing that many within the white nationalist movement seem to have missed is that European and Palestinian girls have something in common: they are both being persecuted and abused by an aggressive foreign invading force that wants to displace and replace them. As ethno-nationalists our position should be clear: Palestine should be for the Palestinians and Europe for the Europeans. Nationalists should be fighting for a world where Palestinian children are free to play amongst the olive trees without fear of Israeli snipers, and where English school girls are free to play in the street without fear of Muslim rape gangs.